Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Around the States
October 31, 2005
National rulings of interest to you and your practice.
PA Co-Parent Wins Primary Custody Against Biological Mother
October 31, 2005
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a lower court ruling that gave primary custody of two children to the lesbian former partner of the children's biological mother. Of notable significance, neither court ruled that the biological mother was an unfit parent, but rather than the "best interests of the children" dictated that the non-biological mother would provide a better household. The three-judge panel's ruling was unanimous.
News Briefs
October 31, 2005
Information you need to know.
Michigan: Marriage Amendment Does Not Affect Partner Benefits
October 31, 2005
In a significant ruling that rejects the position of Michigan's attorney general, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Joyce Draganchuk ruled on Sept. 27 in _<i>National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Granholm</i>_, No. 05-368-CZ, that the anti-gay marriage amendment Michigan voters added to their state constitution last year does not ban domestic partnership health benefits for public employees in the state.
Constitutional Thematics and the 'Peculiar' Federal Marriage Amendment
October 31, 2005
For leading proponents and opponents of legalizing same-sex marriages in the United States, the legal arguments have been fairly well exhausted. Both sides are clear about where they stand on the issue, and why. So it is rare when an attorney or legal scholar looks at the issue with a fresh angle. At a symposium in September sponsored by the J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University and the Marriage and Family Law Research Grant, Scott Dodson provided just such a surprise. In his presentation, excerpted here, Dodson, a Washington, DC, attorney, suggests that the proposed wording of the Federal Marriage Amendment is so broad that it would have an unprecedented effect on other constitutional values, and, without taking a stand on the issue of same-sex marriage, he suggests that more limited language would pose less danger to those values. Dodson's presentation will be published in full in the <i>Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law</i> in Vol. 20, No. 2 Federal Marriage Amendment Symposium edition.
Non-Traditional Settlements and the IRS
October 31, 2005
<b><i>Part Two of a Two-Part Article</i></b>. Even the IRS appears to have some reservations about its position, particularly as such position is applied to the corporate transferee collecting payments on a shareholder note received as a capital contribution in a Section 351 transaction (or otherwise).
Decisions of Interest
October 31, 2005
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
Adult Children of Divorce
October 31, 2005
Most professionals in our area of the law hate custody trials. We see how children are pulled apart by the inability of their parents to resolve their disputes; the pressure children face when they are put in the middle of a conflict and the pain of submitting to examinations by different experts, psychologists, lawyers and judges. Those of us who practice responsibly try to inform our clients, to the extent possible, of the risks to their children. We caution them, when we see them spinning off into their anger, or their desire for revenge, to think of their children. We advise them to hire therapists for children who are having trouble. We tell them to encourage their children to attend school-run groups for children whose parents are divorcing.
Divorce and the Assignment of Income Doctrine
October 31, 2005
One who is entitled to receive income, including interest or compensation for services, but assigns the income to another before it becomes due, will be taxed on it just as though he or she had actually received it and then paid it over to the assignee. This concept is known as the assignment of income doctrine.
Confronting Medical Error
October 31, 2005
In September of this year, a medical malpractice suit pending in Wilkes-Barre, PA, generated significant publicity as the case proceeded to trial. In that case, plaintiffs Tukishia and William Bobbett filed suit against Mercy Hospital and several physicians following the death of their 4-year-old son in the hospital's emergency room. The child, Torajee Bobbett, died after spending more than 9 hours at the hospital on July 19, 2001 into July 20, 2001, without obtaining proper treatment, according to documents filed in the court record. Several aspects of plaintiffs' claim related to alleged deficiencies with the Emergency Department's policies, procedures and staffing at the time Torajee was treated.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›
  • In the Spotlight
    On May 9, 2003, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts announced that Bayer Corporation, the pharmaceutical manufacturer, had been sentenced and ordered to pay a criminal fine of $5,590,800 stemming from its earlier plea of guilty to violating the Federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act by failing to list with the FDA its drug product, Cipro, that was privately labeled for an HMO. Such listing is required under the federal Food, Drug &amp; Cosmetic Act. The Federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act, Pub. L. 100-293, enacted on April 22, 1988, as modified on August 26, 1992 by the Prescription Drug Amendments (PDA) Pub. L. 102-353, 106 Stat. 941, amended sections 301, 303, 503, and 801 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. '' 331, 333, 353, 381, to establish requirements for distributing prescription drug samples.
    Read More ›