In the Spotlight: Being Gun-Shy ' Difficulties Surrounding the Trigger of Rights of First Refusal and First Offer
The right of first refusal ('ROFR') and its close cousin, the right of first offer ('ROFO'), collectively sometimes called pre-emptive rights, are devices used to afford the grantee a degree of flexibility in potentially buying or leasing the subject property at a future time. These rights can be considerably more troublesome, especially to grantors, than may be immediately apparent to many real estate deal makers. Many who have been 'burned' recognize that the problems include: 1) financial loss and delay in completing a transaction that arise from dampened interest in the subject property on the part of third-party potential bidders, and 2) disputes (sometimes resulting in litigation) that arise from issues surrounding the triggering, execution, and preservation of the right. This article focuses on the second problem, with special emphasis on disputes that revolve around the triggering of the pre-emptive rights. It also suggests certain drafting implications that follow from the analysis.
How To Improve Firm Profitability
Many lawyers measure their firm's profitability the way a company does ' as a percentage of sales. However, the correct way to measure the profitability of a law firm, whether it is a partnership or a professional corporation, is the net income per equity partner (NI/EP) (or shareholder).
Substance over Form in the Bankruptcy Courts
Under the Bankruptcy Code, whether a lease is a true lease or a disguised security agreement also has serious consequences. If a lease is a true lease, and the debtor in possession has need of the equipment or other leased property, the lessor is entitled to receive all the payments due under the contract. If a lease is not a true lease but is a disguised security agreement, the lender is only entitled to the lesser of what is owed and the property's value, which could be significantly less than the totality of the lease payments. The balance will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Further, the creditor will only be entitled to the value of the collateral if it perfected its lien. If it did not perfect, its entire claim will be treated as a general secured claim (which is why informational filings of UCC-1 forms are recommended in lease transactions). Even if it did perfect, payment could be delayed until a plan is confirmed and even then stretched out over the length of the plan as opposed to the terms required by the original contract. For these reasons, usually the debtor will argue that the lease is a disguised security agreement, and the creditor will argue that the lease is a true lease.
In The Marketplace
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
Cross-Border Disputes and the Potential for Resolution via Mediation
The world is rapidly becoming a smaller place in which to do business. And as international borders and boundaries become less of a barrier to business, participants in equipment leasing and finance find their world getting smaller, as well. "Globalization" is now an accepted and well-understood concept in most industries and markets, and it is no longer limited to large multinational corporations or institutions. With suppliers, vendors, and customers in many countries on several continents, all linked through the omnipresent Web and Internet, even small, independent businesses may successfully operate across borders.
Arbitration Clauses: Do's and Don'ts for Leasing Lawyers
When faced with a transaction in which the arbitration of potential future disputes would offer advantages over court litigation or other forms of dispute resolution, a critical first step is to create a workable, enforceable arbitration agreement. In most instances, this agreement will be the "arbitration clause" included in the lease. A poorly drafted arbitration clause can create time-consuming and costly delays to the arbitration process. Arbitration agreements must be drafted carefully, and expert advice should be sought on all but the most straightforward two-party, single-contract cases. For U.S. parties involved in cross-border transactions, an arbitration agreement may be more appealing than court litigation because of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention") under which awards may be enforced abroad with relative ease. The New York Convention currently has 137 signatory countries. No analogous treaty currently exists for court awards rendered in the United States.
Appellate Division Awards Compound Interest in Takings Case
In its April 19, 2005 decision in <i>520 East 81st Street Associates v. State of New York</i>, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that principles of just compensation require that claimant be awarded compound interest as part of its takings damages. While various Federal and state courts had previously awarded compound interest under such circumstances, <i>520 East 81st Street</i> marks the first time that a New York State Court has done so.
Negotiating Parking Privileges in Commercial Leases: What Every Tenant Should Know
Parking privileges are often essential to the businesses of commercial tenants. Given this proposition, it is surprising that many commercial tenants and their legal counsel often overlook important parking issues in favor of what may appear to be more pressing legal and economic issues in the lease negotiation process. This is unfortunate, as inadequate or ambiguous parking provisions can: 1) lead to costly legal battles, 2) harm a tenant's business, and 3) cause the deterioration of the landlord-tenant relationship.
