Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Documentation and Other Effective Ways to Avoid Liability for Discrimination
August 31, 2004
As Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the primary federal discrimination law) celebrates its 40th anniversary, the method of proving a discrimination claim has greatly evolved. Virtually gone are the "smoking gun" statements using the "n-word," advertisements for applicants of a certain sex, or statements that individuals over a certain age aren't qualified to apply for a particular job. Although the world hasn't reached an era of perfection, blatant discriminatory expressions or policies are comparatively infrequent in modern discrimination litigation.
Sexual Harassment
August 31, 2004
The comedian George Carlin once asked, "If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?" A similar question arises in the context of sexual harassment: If a supervisor demands sexual favors of his subordinate and she silently acquiesces to keep her job, does she have a claim of sexual harassment against her employer? Despite the Supreme Court's many pronouncements on sexual harassment, the answer to that precise question is still unresolved.
The Big Fix How Proposed Changes to the Patent Process Would Impact the Strategy and Value of Patent Portfolios
August 31, 2004
In an effort to bring certainty to managing an intellectual property portfolio, Congress may soon consider overhauling certain aspects of the patent statutes…
European Community Trademark: Two Tracks - One Destination
August 31, 2004
In late June 2004, the European Community acceded to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Madrid Protocol on the international registration…
Patent Licensing: A Checklist
August 31, 2004
Intellectual property portfolio management is an essential part of any tech company's business strategy. Part of the management strategy must include implementation…
Quarterly State Compliance Review
August 31, 2004
The summer months are usually a busy time for lawyers who track changes to state corporation statutes to make sure their corporate clients are in compliance. This summer has been no different, as many states enacted amendments to their corporation codes that went into effect in July and August. This edition of the Quarterly State Compliance Review highlights several of these amendments. This edition also looks at some recent cases of interest.
Internal Information Controls: Corporate Accountability
August 31, 2004
The swift enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) in the wake of numerous corporate scandals brought at least as many questions as solutions for executives charged with ensuring corporate compliance with SOX's many provisions. As the various compliance deadlines for SOX draw near or expire and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to release rules and guidelines, even more questions emerge, requiring executives to quickly gain familiarity with otherwise unfamiliar topics in order to avoid the potential liability associated with violations of the law. One such topic is the security and control of financial information.
The Future of Investment Company Governance
August 31, 2004
In the wake of the market timing and late trading scandals in the investment company industry, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or "Commission") recently adopted rules and rule amendments designed to enhance the governance practices of registered investment companies ("funds"). In an effort to protect shareholders and reduce conflicts of interest between fund boards and fund investment advisers, the SEC has adopted rules that, among other things, proscribe the composition of and processes for fund boards, increase the required disclosure regarding approval of investment advisory contracts and create the position of fund chief compliance officer (CCO) who reports to the board. This article addresses the responsibilities fund boards will face in the wake of these new rules.
Compliance Hotline
August 31, 2004
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
In The Courts
August 31, 2004
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
    With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
    Read More ›
  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›
  • The Stranger to the Deed Rule
    In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
    Read More ›