Utah and Michigan 'Do-Not E-Mail' Programs Take Effect
It is of concern to and important for e-commerce ventures to note that two states ' Michigan and Utah ' now prohibit the sending of certain kinds of e-mail messages to destinations listed on state-maintained registries. The new laws are directly at variance with the policy of the federal government, which so far has declined to adopt a do-not e-mail list. <br>But unless, and until, the Michigan and Utah registries are declared to be pre-empted by federal law, affected businesses should obtain and comply with those states' registries.
Are Your Lease Payments Still Deductible? The Confounding IRS Guidance Limiting the 'Entertainment' Use of Business Aircraft
In its zeal to eradicate perceived abuses and further clip the wings of executives who, based on press reports, took great pleasure in using the company's airplane for personal purposes, Congress amended section 274(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 ("AJCA"). Effective on the date of enactment (Oct. 22, 2004), these amendments effectively reversed the decisions of the Tax Court and Eighth Circuit in <i>Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc. v. Commissioner</i>, 114 T.C. 197 (2000), <i>aff'd</i> 255 F.3d 495 (8th Cir. 2001), <i>acq.</i> AOD 2002-02 (Feb. 11, 2002), and prompted the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS" or the "Service") to issue guidance containing a myriad of rule changes and hinting at others, leaving tax practitioners scratching their heads and companies running for cover.
Substance Over Style As a Winning Combination
It is unfortunate that firms do not fully understand or appreciate the importance of marketing and communications, but nevertheless continue to throw money at their programs without analyzing their needs. The firms that made the list were chosen on the basis of their accomplishments and not as much about their staffing or budgets. While these aspects were taken into consideration, the number of staffers and the budgets did not affect the final listing. Some firms actually do quite a bit more with less staff and less money. As a veteran of law firm marketing and communications, I felt extremely confident in including these firms because I know what they are about and I know their people. The valuation of all the firms is reflective of programs that are differentiators in the world of law firms and in many ways mirror Corporate America's marketing programs. <br>Some of the more important aspects of several marketing and communications programs that struck a chord as having well thought-out and meaningful programs that provide a glimpse into the substance over style world of law firm marketing and communications programs.
Utah and Michigan 'Do Not E-mail' Programs Take Effect
Two states ' Michigan and Utah ' now prohibit the sending of certain kinds of e-mail messages to destinations listed on state-maintained registries. The new laws are directly at variance with the policy of the federal government, which so far has declined to adopt a "Do Not E-mail" list. But unless and until the Michigan and Utah registries are declared to be pre-empted by federal law, affected businesses should obtain and comply with those states' registries.
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: The Defense Discusses Benefits and Minefields
We were there at the beginning. Members of Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Public Policy Group were seated at the table with others in the business community when plans were first discussed to create a law that would change the jurisdiction of the federal courts so that cases that were truly interstate in nature were resolved in those courts, and not in what has been referred to as state "Judicial Hellholes". (A full explanation and description of Judicial Hellholes is located at <i>www.atra.org</i>.)
Practice Tip: Representing the Client Who Failed to Read the Label
When analyzing a product liability case involving a failure to adequately warn, keep in mind that an element of that claim is causation. Restatement (2d) of Torts 402A, comment J provides that a manufacturer may assume that users will read and heed an adequate warning; however, that presupposes the plaintiff can read. Suppose the plaintiff cannot read because he or she is an infant, illiterate, a foreign speaking laborer or a factory worker who never had access to any printed warnings?
The Class Action Fairness Act: Implications for MDLs
On Feb. 18, 2005, President Bush signed into law the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"). The primary purpose of this legislation was to reduce forum shopping in class action-friendly state courts by granting federal courts greater jurisdiction over class action lawsuits. It is this primary purpose that received most of the attention in the mainstream media and in legal analyses of this legislation.
Grable & Sons Reaffirms the Smith Approach to Federal Question Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court's recent unanimous decision in <i>Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing</i>, 125 S. Ct. 2363 (2005), put to rest almost 20 years of uncertainty regarding the scope of federal question jurisdiction. Responding to a split within the Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court at long last addressed its holding in <i>Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson</i>, 478 U.S. 804 (1986), that continued to baffle lower federal courts and legal scholars ' namely, whether <i>Merrell Dow</i> required a federal cause of action as a condition for exercising federal question jurisdiction. <i>Grable & Sons</i> not only responded with a resounding "no," concluding that federal question jurisdiction does not require a federal private right of action, but it also reaffirmed the Court's longstanding commitment to the broader and more flexible <i>Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.</i>, 255 U.S. 180 (1921), approach to federal question jurisdiction.
First Vioxx Ruling What Does It Mean for Merck?
Merck & Co., founded in 1891, has a slogan — what it calls its "guiding philosophy." That philosophy is, "patients first." In the first of many Vioxx trials expected to be litigated in state and federal courts across the country, the jury wasn't buying it. On Aug. 19, after a month-long trial, ten out of 12 jurors — the number needed to return a verdict of guilty — found Merck liable to the plaintiffs, survivors of a man who took Vioxx for pain relief. The damages award was staggering: $24.5 million in economic losses and compensation for mental anguish and $229 million in punitive damages.
