The Aftermath of 9/11: Courts Reject Policyholders' Attempts to Circumvent the Plain Meaning of Business Interruption Coverage
October 01, 2003
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center resulted in a large number of business interruption claims. Stated simply, business interruption coverage is intended to pay the financial losses incurred by an insured during the period necessary to repair the damage caused by an insured loss. Typical business interruption provisions allow for reimbursement of income lost and payment of fixed and continuing expenses. However, business interruption claims are still governed by the general maxim of insurance law: Recovery of insurance proceeds is not intended to place the insured in a better position than it would have been without the loss. Nevertheless, many policyholders are turning to their insurance companies to reimburse them in ways never contemplated by the parties or their insurance contracts. A prime example is the unwarranted attempts to expand the parameters of business interruption coverage in the wake of 9/11.
Ask the Coach
October 01, 2003
This month's question: <br>Many of the lawyers in my firm still resist doing any selling because they see it as "unseemly" for lawyers. How can I help them overcome this crippling bias?
Case Briefs
October 01, 2003
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
A Web/Audio Conference Event
October 01, 2003
RESPECT: Earn It, Keep It, Advance Your Career<br>Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2003<br>12:00 p.m. ' 1:30 p.m. EST
Billing for Recycled Work: A Follow-up Exchange of Views
October 01, 2003
In a recent edition, Professor William G. Ross analyzed the professional ethics restrictions incumbent upon lawyers who want to bill by the hour for previously produced work product. ("The Ethics of Billing by the Hour for 'Recycled' Work," August 2003.) Edward Poll, one of our prominent Board members, responds to the issue.
Unreasonable Compensation in a Professional Corporation
October 01, 2003
Until 2001, the general view was that IRS determinations of "unreasonable compensation" were not a concern for shareholder employees of professional corporations. That equanimity was shattered - at least for those paying attention - by the 2001 Tax Court decision in <i>Pediatric Surgical Associates P.C. v. Commissioner</i> (T.C. Memorandum 2001-81). In that case, the tax court determined that compensation paid to the shareholder physicians in a Texas surgical practice was unreasonably high because it exceeded the value of the services performed by the firm's shareholder physicians. This seminal tax court opinion turned on the issue of profits generated by the non-shareholder surgeons. Analogous compensation scenarios are common in law firms PCs, so they could face similar IRS determinations, with similarly costly results. Lawyers who are PC shareholders should pay close attention to this case.
Risk Management Review: A CFO's Approach
October 01, 2003
Set aside some quiet time every year to think through your insurance and risk management programs with someone knowledgeable in the field. Law firm administrators are mostly not insurance experts, and unless there is some crisis, tend not to give this area the attention it needs. Crisis time may be too late.
Improving Law Firm Profitability
October 01, 2003
<b><i>Without Working Longer Hours or Raising Rates</b></i><p>In today's competitive environment, the profitability challenge to law firms is to increase profits while reducing clients' legal fees. This two-part article provides dozens of specific, workable ideas for enhancing profitability, leaving aside the played-out (and problematic) methods of working longer hours and raising hourly rates. This month's article offers ideas in the following categories, which together offer the greatest opportunities for profitability enhancement.
Law Firm SurveysPart One: The Major Surveys Compared
September 25, 2003
This three-part article will summarize that discussion. Part One is a general overview and comparison of the major surveys currently available for U.S. law firms. Part Two will advise further on how to select a survey, and Part Three will explain how to get the most out of survey participation.
