Structuring a Refranchising Program
There are several things that a franchisor can do in structuring its refranchising program to reduce the likelihood of disputes and litigation. This article discusses the presale market identification and internal due diligence and initial marketing process that culminates in the execution of a letter of intent ("LOI").
Lender Liability and Its Application to Franchising
Lender liability law states that lenders must treat their borrowers fairly and, when they don't, they can be subject to borrower litigation under a variety of legal actions. Franchise relationships have seen their own share of lender liability claims. Franchisees must borrow to acquire assets, franchise agreements, and leasehold interests relating to franchise operations. Thus, franchisees, like all business borrowers, must be aware of their legal rights and legal issues that may arise during the lending relationship.
News Briefs
Highlights of the latest franchising news from across the country.
Court Watch
Highlights of the latest franchising cases from across the country.
Strategies to Enhance Cash Flow
Managing partners, financial partners, members of executive committees and administrators must devote more of their time today than in the past, to planning and managing their firms' finances and those functions that improve the cash flow. This article describes six aspects of law firm management and economics that the author has recommended to managing partners, financial partners, members of management committees and law firm administrators to assist them improve their firm's cash flow. These factors include: 1) cash flow; 2) a business plan; 3) budgets for revenues, expenses and client advances; 4) partner compensation; 5) a recommended new business and billing committee; and 6) partners' capital and borrowing.
Partnering: The Future of Legal Services Has Arrived
Over 10 years ago, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company adopted a model for the procurement of legal services that is based on strict legal spending rules, including early case assessment measures, consolidation of law firms and service providers handling DuPont work, and implementation of numerous other cost-saving measures. The DuPont model, which is commonly referred to as "partnering," has become a platform for the efforts of an increasing number of companies to revamp their legal service expectations and implement changes that embrace partnering between in-house and outside attorneys. Despite the amount of time that partnering has survived and the increasing number of companies adopting a partnering model, most outside counsel still meet the concept of partnering with great skepticism. This skepticism is bred from both an inability to envision the future of the legal services market and the misconception that the sole goal of partnering is to reduce legal bills for corporations at the expense of law firm revenues.
Case Briefs
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
A Primer on the Pollution Exclusion in New York and the Duty to Defend
In June and July of this year, the New York Court of Appeals and the Second Circuit each rendered a new decision on the proper scope and application of the pollution exclusion under New York law with respect to the duty to defend. In <i>Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG Insurance Co.</i>, 100 N.Y.2d 377 (N.Y. 2003), the New York Court of Appeals held that an absolute pollution exclusion did not unambiguously exclude coverage for a personal injury claim asserting injury based on paint fumes inside an office building. In <i>W.R. Grace & Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.</i>, 332 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2003), the Second Circuit held that New York's historical statutory proscription against the insurance of nonsudden, nonaccidental pollution vitiated a policy provision granting coverage for "gradual pollution." The Second Circuit also confirmed in an important choice-of-law ruling that New York courts will not apply the law of various "site states" to a general liability policy; rather, New York courts will apply the single law of the state with the greatest contacts to the dispute. These cases provide further guidance to practitioners regarding (a) the limited scope of the pollution exclusion under New York law to nonenvironmental type claims, (b) the priority given to New York Insurance Law '46(13)-(14) in the face of conflicting policy provisions, and (c) the growing certainty that New York courts will apply the law of a single state to interpret a policy covering multiple risks in various locations.
