Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Webworthy News & Advice
August 13, 2003
For a closer look at these recent accounting-financial items, take a quick trip to the Web.
Managing 70%
August 12, 2003
Imagine the CEO of a major international corporation saying to her Board of Directors, 'We are doing a great job of managing 70% of our productive capacity.' And the Board responding, 'Great job, here's your bonus.' Or another CEO who says, 'We don't need to hire managers for our regional plants, because 70% of our capacity is in the main plant anyway. Let the others do what they want.' Hard to imagine, isn't it? Of course it is, because the concept of ignoring 30% of your business' productive capacity ' leaving it to 'manage itself' or, worse, considering it unimportant ' would get you fired in any business in the world.
Managing Fiscal Fundamentals
August 12, 2003
Understanding a law firm's fiscal affairs is not that difficult. One need only understand a few basic concepts ' concepts that are no different for the law firm or the law firm's clients. The trick is not in understanding the numbers but in managing for results. For a law firm, this is an even greater challenge. Its owners are well educated, strong willed, success driven, practice focused, independent minded and, at least for trial lawyers, somewhat more argumentative than the general population. The owners are also large in number relative to the total number of employees and are active in the day-to-day operations of the firm.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
August 12, 2003
San Francisco will be the site of the 16th annual conference and workshops on <b>Law Firm Management &amp; Economics</b>, hosted by our Board member Joel A. Rose on March 20-21.
Committing Firm Resources to a Proposed Ancillary Business: A Checklist
August 12, 2003
The following discussion and checklist are based on guidance provided in <i>Beyond Legal Practice: Organizing and Managing Ancillary Businesses</i>. Thanks are due to The Hildebrandt Institute and author James W. Jones for permission to adapt their material. For details on this currently very popular booklet, see Hildebrandt's website, www.hildebrandtinstitute.com. (We're looking forward to more Hildebrandt advice on ancillary businesses: another topic from this popular booklet will be expanded upon in a future edition of the <i>A&amp;FP</i> newsletter.)
Motivating Partners to Bill and Collect
August 12, 2003
As in refining any other law practice skill, the key to improving billing and collection is self-motivation, enhanced and supported by the firm's operative structure.
Building a Comp Plan That Works
August 12, 2003
On a recent visit to Altman Weil management consultants in Newtown Square, PA, I met with James D. Cotterman, a longtime contributor to (and just-retiring Editorial Board member of) this newsletter. Jim was the lead author and editor of both the 2nd and 3rd editions of the ABA-published book <i>Compensation Plans for Law Firms</i>. Regrettably I can't share with you Altman Weil's excellent hazelnut coffee, but I hope you'll enjoy the following condensed excerpts from our conversation about Jim's book. With Jim's concurrence, I've also prettied up my sketched notes on some compensation system and profitability interrelationships explained in the book; these flow diagrams appear on pages 2 and 5.
Avoiding Extinction in a Turbulent Legal Market: Financial Hygiene Perils
August 05, 2003
The early days of 2003 have brought a stark reminder to the leaders of law firms: While strong law firms have experienced an exceptional level of prosperity and growth in a consolidating market, continued expansion and ever increasing profitability are not the only potential destinies for law firms today. As the high profile closures of long established firms such as Brobeck; Peterson &amp; Ross; Hill &amp; Barlow and others demonstrate anew, firms can fail.
Progress in Standardizing Law Firm Invoices
August 05, 2003
The legal and accounting professions have made significant strides in defining standard invoice data codes as well as formats for law firm electronic invoices. The standards bandwagon has been in no danger, however, of tipping over from too many community members hurriedly jumping on it.
E-Invoicing: A Client Perspective
August 05, 2003
Our legal department at Atlantic Bank of New York was looking for an electronic invoicing system to make our outside counsel billing process more manageable. What we found was new technology and software that enabled us not only to improve the overall efficiency of our system but also to implement an invoice discounting policy that saves us money and gets our outside counsel paid quickly. Because the new invoicing system lets us turn invoices around so quickly, we have achieved such significant savings that we expect the invoicing system to pay for itself within just a few years.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
    There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
    Read More ›
  • Supreme Court Asked to Assess Per Se Rule Tension in Criminal Antitrust
    In recent years, practitioners have observed a tension between criminal enforcement of the broadly written terms of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the modern Supreme Court's notions of statutory interpretation and due process in the criminal law context. A certiorari petition filed in late August in Sanchez et al. v. United States, asks the Supreme Court to address this tension, as embodied in the judge-made per se rule.
    Read More ›
  • Restrictive Covenants Meet the Telecommunications Act of 1996
    Congress enacted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to encourage development of telecommunications technologies, and in particular, to facilitate growth of the wireless telephone industry. The statute's provisions on pre-emption of state and local regulation have been frequently litigated. Last month, however, the Court of Appeals, in <i>Chambers v. Old Stone Hill Road Associates (see infra<i>, p. 7) faced an issue of first impression: Can neighboring landowners invoke private restrictive covenants to prevent construction of a cellular telephone tower? The court upheld the restrictive covenants, recognizing that the federal statute was designed to reduce state and local regulation of cell phone facilities, not to alter rights created by private agreement.
    Read More ›