Practice Tip: Recovering Under the Theory of Failure to Issue Post-Sale Warnings
Although a product may be reasonably safe when it is sold, a manufacturer that later learns of risks revealed by user operation may be held responsible for failure to issue post-sale warnings. The justification for a post-sale duty to warn arises from a manufacturer's unique and superior position to follow the use and adaptation of its products by consumers. The manufacturer is best placed to learn about post-sale defects or dangers discovered in the use of its products as compared with purchasers and users.
Case Notes
Highlights of the latest product liability cases from around the country.
Online: Learn How to File Electronically
For attorneys who wish to file electronically in the federal district courts, the Case Management — Electronic Case Filing ("CM/ECF") site at <i>www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/cmEcf/</i> is very helpful. Go to the site and click on "Requirements." There you will find both the minimum and recommended configurations for hardware and software for both IBM compatible and Macintosh computers.
Is Bill Gates Public Enemy Number One?
Unfortunately, Americans these days know that terrorists can strike us at home, and anxiety about possible attacks ' from cyber assaults to the not-so-good old-fashioned kind ' is running high. <br>Of course, most Americans' vigilance against an attack is directed overseas, but should at least some of their attention, and that of anyone in e-commerce, focus on Redmond, Washington, the headquarters of Microsoft and its helmsman, Bill Gates?
IP Due Diligence: What Does It Mean to You?
The evaluation of the assets and liabilities of a business is referred to as a due diligence review. Most commonly, these evaluations determine the value of a business for purposes of investment or the establishment of a relationship with the business. Because the value of intellectual property has increased substantially recently and patent protection in many countries has expanded to cover software and business methods, businesses without IP assets and existing or potential IP-related liabilities are rare. With the consistent increase in damages for IP infringement and the possibility of business-crippling injunctions, it is likely that any business will be subject to, or will itself conduct, an IP due diligence.
In The Marketplace
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
Re-examination: The Tail that Wags the Dog
IP litigators appear to have blinders on when it comes to patent re-examination. All eyes are focused on winning the big event, the courtroom victory. To have the verdict upheld on appeal garners the ultimate win. While chasing the big dog of litigation, parties may be overlooking the power that can be wielded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") in a re-examination proceeding.
Case Notes
Highlights of the latest Product Liability cases from around the country.
Rule 68: The Often-Overlooked Defense Tool
The often-overlooked offer of judgment rule — Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 68 — may be a valuable tool for defendants if carefully employed. An offer of judgment's primary benefit is its obvious risk-shifting effect. Rule 68 forces plaintiffs, particularly small plaintiffs, to proceed cautiously in the face of mounting costs and uncertainty.
