Discovery of Trade Secrets: What Constitutes Protected Information?
January 01, 2004
<i>Part One of a Two-Part Series</i> In a technology-driven economy, the threat to trade secret and propriety information is real and visceral. A recent survey estimated that theft of this information resulted in losses of more than $50 billion to the responding companies, which included Fortune 1000 corporations as well as small and midsized businesses, for the year ending June 30, 2001. The American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS) and PriceWaterhouse Coopers, <i>Trends in Proprietary Information Loss: Survey Report</i> (Sept. 2002). It is perhaps only natural that this threat should find its way into litigation, particularly product liability litigation. Discovery in these cases typically involves the production of some of the product manufacturer's proprietary and technical information. More recently, however, claimants have sought the manufacturer's trade secrets — highly confidential information at the heart of the company's business. The responding manufacturer objects to this discovery as causing irreparable harm if disclosed, and the battle lines are drawn.
Are Public Nuisance Lawsuits Against the Handgun Industry Gaining Ground?
January 01, 2004
Much has been written about the many lawsuits initiated by municipalities against the handgun industry. They are premised on the claim that the gun manufacturers and distributors saturate the market and fail to prevent their retailers from selling to persons who might resell to criminals. <i>See, e.g.,</i> Lawrence S. Greenwald, <i>Municipalities' Suits Against Gun Manufacturers ' Legal Folly,</i> 4 J. Health Care Law & Policy 13 (2000). Plaintiffs typically seek both damages and injunctive relief that would change industry marketing practices. The gun industry has challenged the legal sufficiency of the lawsuits on multiple grounds, with the majority of courts that have considered these issues dismissing the lawsuits. Recent developments, however, suggest that the pendulum may be swinging back in the governmental plaintiffs' favor.
Online: Web Site Offers Conservative, Libertarian Legal Resources
January 01, 2004
D. Jeffrey Campbell and Julie Smith Stypinski in their article this month direct readers to the Web site for The Federalist Society, <i>www.fed-soc.org,</i> for a transcript of a symposium on gun litigation. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It was founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to the Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be.
Are You Filing Sales/Use Tax Returns?
January 01, 2004
There is good news for law firms and providers of legal services. Since they are exempt from sales tax in all states, they are not subject to collecting and remitting sales tax. However, because of the use tax (which is the other component reflected on the tax return), law firms and legal service providers should still file sales tax returns in their resident states. More and more law firms and other exempt service providers are being audited by the states for sales and use tax. These audits are resulting in firms being assessed thousands of dollars in use taxes, interest, and, in some instances, penalties.
Med Mal News
January 01, 2004
Important news of interest to you and your practice.
What Lies Beneath: Technology That Supports Effective Compliance
January 01, 2004
Much has been written about the reporting requirements mandated by federal laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act enacted in 1999 (GLBA), but less has been said about the technology that underlies successful efforts to comply. What is clear is that enterprise software and integrated records management are the only viable ways to meet these requirements. The software selected must take into account both changes in these requirements, and the prospect of future state and federal retention and reporting requirements. Since software doesn't exist in a vacuum, hardware and network considerations must be part of the overall system strategy. Law firms with corporate clients and corporate counsel need to be involved in the planning and implementation of such a system.
AFA President Discusses the Challenges of Being a Franchisee
January 01, 2004
For more than a decade, Susan P. Kezios has been one of the most outspoken and effective advocates for franchisees. The organization that she founded in 1993, the American Franchisee Association (AFA), lobbies on behalf of franchisees and conducts numerous educational seminars and conferences throughout the year. In this Q&A, Kezios discusses the most prominent challenges that franchisees face today and gives her "insider" perspective on how those challenges can be surmounted.
The Early Warning Signals of a Potential Media Crisis
January 01, 2004
Sixty-two percent of Americans equate "no comment" with "we're guilty", and the numbers have only gone up since Enron. A legal media strategy based on "no comment" is increasingly likely to lead to danger. An increasingly sensitive legal profession is confronting the same challenge on an almost daily basis: "I understand I need to be more vigilant about helping my client, and my own firm, navigate the landmines of high-profile cases. I know I need the skills to work with media professionals once the case goes public, but is there anything I can do before a problem gets dumped on my lap? How do I recognize the early warning signs of a potential crisis now, not when the reporters start calling?"
CAN SPAM Act: A Compliance Challenge A Detailed Look At What The New Act Means For e-Commerce; Marketers May Still Have A Say
January 01, 2004
In recent years, Congress has considered, but failed to adopt, dozens of proposals to control unsolicited commercial e-mail. Meanwhile, more than half the states passed laws banning specific forms of e-mail deception and requiring affirmative disclosures. California's much-discussed anti-spam law took the next step, prohibiting commercial e-mail sent without consumers' affirmative, opt-in, consent. This legislation, which was set to take effect Jan. 1, forced the e-mail marketing industry to lobby Congress for less restrictive, pre-emptive federal legislation. The result was the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Act), which President Bush signed Dec. 16, and took effect Jan. 1. The Act pre-empts state laws, except to the extent that they prohibit any e-mail message or attachment falsity or deception. This article provides a detailed look at the new federal Act ' including the possibility for e-mail marketers to continue shaping the law in upcoming rulemaking proceedings.
