Future Of Online Dispute Resolution Is Being Tested
June 29, 2006
How a federal judge in Trenton, NJ, rules in a patent infringement case could decide the future of online dispute resolution. <br>The case pits Cybersettle, the White Plains, NY, leader in the field, against National Arbitration Forum (NAF), a Minnesota-based company hired to administer New Jersey's No Fault Automobile Insurance Personal Injury Protection (PIP). At the end of May, U.S. District Judge Mary Cooper heard arguments on cross motions for summary judgment on the scope of Cybersettle's 2001 patent, No. 6,330,551, for a 'computerized dispute resolution system and method.'
Bloggers Entitled To Immunity
June 29, 2006
Bloggers cannot be hit with libel suits on the basis of anonymous postings on their Web sites because federal law grants them immunity by explicitly stating that they cannot be treated as the 'publisher' of such comments, a federal judge has ruled.
Who Inherits Your e-Mail?
June 29, 2006
The Internet has allowed new assets to spring into existence for consideration by competent tax and estate planners. All Internet assets are intangible personal property ' they cannot be seen, felt or perceived by the ordinary senses. For tax and estate planning purposes, each Internet asset is subject to one of three different legal classes.
Asset Creation, Seclusion And Money Laundering In The Virtual World
June 29, 2006
As more and more people take up residence in the virtual world ' sometimes also called digital or synthetic worlds ' through their participation in one of the many 'Massively Multiplayer Online Role-playing Games' (MMPORGs) currently available online, the potential for monetary abuse and malfeasance also increases. While the original virtual worlds were built by private gaming companies for their subscriber base and were fully controlled by the designers and their all-encompassing End-User Licensing Agreements (EULA), new MMPORGs have emerged that provide individual players with more freedoms ' including the ability to create, seclude or launder wealth. The likelihood of this new technology being co-opted for unscrupulous purposes is great, since historically the same has happened in response to other advances in technology.
Bit Parts
June 29, 2006
Copyright Infringement/Attorney Fees<br>Executive Compensation/Severance Pay<br>Film Distribution/Net Profits
Practice Tip: Will the Real Drug Manufacturer Please Stand Up?
June 28, 2006
You are defending a manufacturer in a pharmaceutical product liability action. The plaintiff has testified that she obtained a prescription from her doctor for your client's medication and filled it at a reputable, national chain pharmacy. The doctor's records confirm that the prescription was written and the pharmacy records confirm that it was filled with your client's product. Normally, that scenario would dispel any doubts concerning the adequacy of product identification and you would identify other fronts on which to defend.
The Shifting Landscape of e-Discovery
June 28, 2006
This month, we bring you another in a continuing series of articles on the U.S. Supreme Court-approved proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which become effective Dec. 1 ' unless Congress acts to veto or alter them. Last month, two guest authors explored and defined the concept of accessible and inaccessible electronically stored information as defined by the new rules. This month's article expands on some aspects of that discussion, and provides a new discussion of some elements related to the production and handling, and the disclosure and protection of e-discovery data, including confidential information, under amended Rule 37, and briefly ponders the possible guidance that recently issued Sedona Conference guidelines may provide judges.
Achieving Optimal Evaluation of Business and Commercial Cases
June 28, 2006
Perhaps one of the most important services an attorney can provide to a client is discerning the merits of a case and the likely outcomes during the course of litigation. But what is the best way to go about evaluating a case? And if, as experience has taught, there is no 'best' way to evaluate a case, are there some really good ones that can be counted on to give the client sound advice over a broad range of potential types of cases?
Departing Employees
June 28, 2006
Most companies have taken care to ensure that new and departing employees have completed Human Resource files with nondisclosure agreements, non-competition agreements (where applicable), invention and assignment agreements and various other agreements, acknowledgements and forms. Are companies doing enough to protect themselves from intellectual property theft by departing employees and consultants?
