Privacy, Please!
April 28, 2006
We're there, and we know it: The union of the Internet and commerce has led to increases in productivity, convenience and access for consumers everywhere. At the same time, it has spawned volumes of acute privacy concern. It's not unusual to hear of businesses inadvertently publicizing consumers' personal data ' or, worse, hackers obtaining personal financial information. It seems to happen all too often at credit-card companies, banks and the local supermarket.<br>Of course, concerns over these privacy issues have reached the sector of the legal trade that advises and defends the banking industry, and with a vengeance, as evidenced by the various privacy related provisions incorporated in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA). In particular, the BAPCPA incorporated the Leahy-Hatch Amendment, also known as The Privacy Policy Enforcement in Bankruptcy Act of 2001 (PPEBA), which I had the honor of drafting. In particular, the PPEBA, in order to address certain privacy concerns, amended Bankruptcy Code '363(b)(1) and added pre-conditions to the sale or use of consumer data; added a new '332, creating the 'privacy ombudsman'; and defined 'personally identifiable data' in '101(41A). This article will review the development of these amendments, and analyze their potential impact for practitioners.
A Tale Of 'He Said, e-Said'
April 28, 2006
Do e-commerce clients really understand when they cross the imaginary boundary where the law stops and the ambiguity begins? In other words, do lawyer and client realize what each knows ' or thinks he or she knows ' about Internet law, on the one hand, and the realities of online business, on the other hand? Do clients realize how much lawyers don't know about e-commerce law and business, and how much law hasn't yet been developed?
Keep Internet Disclosures From Costing Your Company
April 28, 2006
With securities claims involving improper Internet disclosures on the rise, a company would be wise to institute a review process, carried out by a qualified person (general counsel or compliance officer), to assure that its Internet disclosures are accurate, complete, and appropriate. Following are some questions that should be asked as part of an Internet review, along with suggestions for 'common sense' measures for reducing a company's exposure and keeping pace with Web evolution.
Net News
April 27, 2006
European Music Industry Files 2000 Lawsuits in 10 Countries<br>Online Ad Revenue Grows For Third Year in a Row<br>Arkansas Judge Approves Google Settlement<br>NY Attorney General Sues Major 'Spyware' Internet Company
Netflix Screens Patent Controversy
April 27, 2006
The patent dispute between online DVD rental rivals Netflix Inc. and Blockbuster Inc. not only pits two big-name competitors against each other, but it also highlights the ongoing debate over Internet business-method patents.
Speak No Evil
April 27, 2006
An age-old question of Internet law has heated up the intrastate rivalry between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but this time it's not sports teams or gubernatorial candidates; it's judges. Yes, judges.<br>The question: When can an anonymous Internet speaker accused of defamation be unmasked? The combatants: Judge Albert Sheppard of Phila-delphia and Judge R. Stanton Wettick of Pittsburgh ' two of Pennsylvania's most respected jurists. If Pennsylvania can be split on the issue, so can other states. Which argument is correct?
Justices Appear Torn in eBay Patent Case
April 27, 2006
Two veterans of the U.S. Supreme Court bar argued forcefully ' and inconclusively ' last month in a high-stakes dispute over how easy it should be for a patent holder to win an injunction against an infringer.<br>From the tenor of the questioning in <i>eBay v. MercExchange</i>, justices seemed closely divided over the issue.
Wikipedia Creates Concerns Aplenty About the Web's Reliability
April 27, 2006
Although the online encyclopedia Wikipedia recently added its 1 millionth English-language article, controversy over the value of its content continues. Concerns arise because Wikipedia has no single editor, and anyone (or virtually anyone) can add a new entry or edit an existing one. <br>Reliability concerns are in no way limited to Wikipedia, but pervade legal research done on the Internet.
