Valuing Licenses and Degrees, New York Style
November 29, 2006
New York often serves as a leading venue for concepts in matrimonial law. Although states differ widely on valuation issues such as personal and organizational goodwill, the concept of value to a professional license or degree has a certain amount of differentiation to the marital pot. Matrimonial attorneys need to recognize the valuation theories underscoring arguments of earnings capacity. Depending upon the applicable state's case law, these theories will impact their next case.
NY Courts Define 'Egregious Conduct'
November 29, 2006
Like New Jersey, New York generally does not consider fault when distributing marital assets. (<i>See</i> Strober L: Marital Misconduct and Alimony. <i>The Matrimonial Strategist</i>, November 2006.) However, there are circumstances under which both states will factor in fault.
Prenuptial Agreements
November 29, 2006
When a party to a divorce seeks to invalidate a prenuptial agreement, it often is on the grounds of duress/coercion. Two aspects of that claim that seem to be raised most often are that the wife-to-be was pregnant, and the husband-to-be threatened that without a prenuptial agreement there would be no marriage; and/or that the agreement was signed on the eve of the wedding. Recent cases throughout the nation have demonstrated that courts are reluctant to invalidate agreements on these bases. Some examples follow in this article.
Litigation
October 30, 2006
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Data Mining
October 30, 2006
The first part of this article discussed the importance and focus of data retrieval in matrimonial actions and the parameters of data mining. The conclusion herein addresses privacy concerns, the impact of e-mail, and the costs of data retrieval.
Marital Misconduct and Alimony
October 30, 2006
Decisional law in New Jersey has long expressed the view that alimony is neither a punishment for the payor nor a reward for the payee. <i>Aronson v. Aronson</i>, 245 N.J. Super. 354, 364 (App. Div.1991). Rather, it is an economic right that arises out of the marital relationship that provides a dependent spouse with a level of support and standard of living commensurate with the quality of economic life that existed during the marriage. <i>Stiffler v. Stiffler</i>, 304 N.J. Super 96, 99 (Ch. Div.1997) (quoting <i>Koelble v. Koelble</i>, 261 N.J. Super. 190, 192-93 (App. Div. 1992)).
'Equitable Paternity'
October 30, 2006
He who acts like a father is a father ' at least legally, even if not biologically. New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, concluded this in a recent ruling, imposing 'equitable paternity' on a man who wrongly assumed he had fathered a daughter and acted accordingly.
State Ruling May Have National Impact
October 30, 2006
On March 27, 2006, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division decided a case that may have national implications because it involved federal law. <i>Pryce v. Scharff</i>, 384 N.J. Super. 197, 894 A.2d 668 (2006). Although this opinion went fairly unnoticed in the matrimonial community, its impact upon current and future litigation promises to be profound. To summarize briefly, the <i>Pryce</i> case involved the issue of whether overdue child support judgments should be subject to post-judgment interest. After reviewing the federal and state statutes and the current New Jersey Court Rules, the Appellate Division ruled in the affirmative.
New Jersey Supreme Court Punts Same-Sex Marriage to Legislature
October 25, 2006
On Oct. 25, New Jersey stopped short of becoming the second state in the nation to legalize same-sex marriage by judicial fiat. The state's high court, while declaring unconstitutional state laws that deny same-sex couples the financial and social benefits and privileges given to married heterosexuals, held that fixing the problem is a legislative task ' and gave lawmakers 180 days in which to do it.
Data Mining
September 27, 2006
Few technological advancements or social movements have impacted matrimonial law as profoundly as the computer/electronic age. Today, litigants have a virtual Pandora's box of incredibly vast yet retrievable information at their fingertips, which all too often remains underutilized or undiscovered. Currently, stored data can be retrieved from joint marital assets such as computers, cell phones or even facsimile devices with memory capabilities. The information stems from usage, whether explicitly 'saved' by the computer operator or not. It can later be deciphered or interpreted by a trained professional and can yield countless bits of information to assist in discovery.
