Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search

We found 1,594 results for "New York Real Estate Law Reporter"...

Real Property Law
January 31, 2014
In-depth analysis of important rulings.
Landlord & Tenant
January 31, 2014
Discussion of several important cases.
Eminent Domain Law
January 31, 2014
Discussions about prior zoning classification, and condemning of property.
Development
January 31, 2014
A major ruling is discussed.
The Scope of the 'Mandatory Settlement Conference' Requirement for Mortgage Foreclosures
January 31, 2014
In response to skyrocketing foreclosures, the New York legislature enacted CPLR 3408. A recent case explores the statute's limits.
Landlord & Tenant
December 31, 2013
Tenant Did Not Breach Obligation to Use Reasonable Efforts <br>Fraud Allegations Require Investigation Beyond Four-Year Period
Real Property Law
December 31, 2013
Not All Hedges Are <i>De Minimis</i> for Adverse Possession Purposes <br>Adverse Possession of Mapped Streets<br>No Punitive Damages Against Title Insurer
Cooperatives & Condominiums
December 31, 2013
Penthouse Owner Can't Stop Roof Garden <BR>Co-Op Board Cannot Reallocate Shares
Reconsidering the Special Facts Exception
December 31, 2013
Special facts is a court-created equitable doctrine that allows a land use applicant to avoid the impact of a change of zone enacted while the application is pending, by showing significant governmental delay of the application together with proof that but for the delay, the landowner would have been able to vest in its use before the zoning was changed. In November 2013, the Court of Appeals decided <i>Rocky Point</i>, a case that the plaintiff (represented by the author) hoped would not only allow it to prevail, but would also clarify the special facts doctrine.
Real Property Law
November 27, 2013
In-depth analysis of two major rulings.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›
  • A Playbook for Disrupting Traditional CRM
    Here's the playbook for disruption: Take attorneys out of the equation. Stop building CRM that succeeds or fails on their shoulders. We need to shift the focus and, instead, build the technology from the ground up for the professionals who actually use it: marketing and business development.
    Read More ›