Court Casts Doubts on Value of Information Disclaimers in Lease Syndications
August 01, 2005
In a standard lease syndication transaction, the lease syndicator (<i>ie</i>, the seller of the lease) wants to ensure that it is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the underlying lessee's financial data. The seller thus typically requires its buyer to affirmatively acknowledge that the buyer itself has made a complete and independent investigation of the lessee's financial condition and is fully satisfied with the lessor's credit standing. The buyer will also be expected to acknowledge that, in acquiring the syndicated lease, it is in no way relying on the seller's business judgment or financial expertise, and has not relied on any information provided by the seller as to the lessee's financial condition.
In the Marketplace
August 01, 2005
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
SEC Issues Staff Report On Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Special Purpose Entities and Related Issues
August 01, 2005
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the release of a staff report on June 15th prepared by the Office of the Chief Accountant, the Office of Economic Analysis and the Division of Corporation Finance on off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities and related issues. The report was prepared pursuant to Section 401(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As required by that Act, the report has been submitted to the president, the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives. The staff report includes an analysis of the filings of issuers as well as an analysis of pertinent U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and Commission disclosure rules. The report describes the staff's study, details its findings, and provides recommendations. Notably, the report prominently identifies leasing as a key focus and a high priority for an FASB project.
In The Marketplace
June 29, 2005
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
Cross-Border Disputes and the Potential for Resolution via Mediation
June 29, 2005
The world is rapidly becoming a smaller place in which to do business. And as international borders and boundaries become less of a barrier to business, participants in equipment leasing and finance find their world getting smaller, as well. "Globalization" is now an accepted and well-understood concept in most industries and markets, and it is no longer limited to large multinational corporations or institutions. With suppliers, vendors, and customers in many countries on several continents, all linked through the omnipresent Web and Internet, even small, independent businesses may successfully operate across borders.
Substance over Form in the Bankruptcy Courts
June 29, 2005
Under the Bankruptcy Code, whether a lease is a true lease or a disguised security agreement also has serious consequences. If a lease is a true lease, and the debtor in possession has need of the equipment or other leased property, the lessor is entitled to receive all the payments due under the contract. If a lease is not a true lease but is a disguised security agreement, the lender is only entitled to the lesser of what is owed and the property's value, which could be significantly less than the totality of the lease payments. The balance will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Further, the creditor will only be entitled to the value of the collateral if it perfected its lien. If it did not perfect, its entire claim will be treated as a general secured claim (which is why informational filings of UCC-1 forms are recommended in lease transactions). Even if it did perfect, payment could be delayed until a plan is confirmed and even then stretched out over the length of the plan as opposed to the terms required by the original contract. For these reasons, usually the debtor will argue that the lease is a disguised security agreement, and the creditor will argue that the lease is a true lease.
The Latest News on NorVergence
June 29, 2005
There have been three recent developments in two state courts in the closely watched NorVergence matter. First, a Florida circuit court judge dismissed the State Attorney General's suit against a number of leasing companies, holding that the leasing companies had not violated Florida's laws. Among other things, the court stated that the hell and high water and the waiver of defense and warranties clauses are permitted under Florida law and that the NorVergence forum selection clause is valid and enforceable under Florida law.
Arbitration Clauses: Do's and Don'ts for Leasing Lawyers
June 29, 2005
When faced with a transaction in which the arbitration of potential future disputes would offer advantages over court litigation or other forms of dispute resolution, a critical first step is to create a workable, enforceable arbitration agreement. In most instances, this agreement will be the "arbitration clause" included in the lease. A poorly drafted arbitration clause can create time-consuming and costly delays to the arbitration process. Arbitration agreements must be drafted carefully, and expert advice should be sought on all but the most straightforward two-party, single-contract cases. For U.S. parties involved in cross-border transactions, an arbitration agreement may be more appealing than court litigation because of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention") under which awards may be enforced abroad with relative ease. The New York Convention currently has 137 signatory countries. No analogous treaty currently exists for court awards rendered in the United States.
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005: Important Implications for the Equipment Leasing Industry
June 07, 2005
On April 20, 2005, President Bush signed The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 into law (the "Act"). Although the Act has received much media attention in recent months for its potential impact upon consumers seeking protection under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Code"), it does contain a number of amendments to the Code that will affect, either directly or indirectly, the ways in which equipment lessors will relate to their liquidating or reorganizing lessees. This article provides a brief overview of some of the new amendments to the Code and explains how they will change the dynamics between lessors and lessees.
In The Marketplace
May 26, 2005
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
