Employers and Employees
January 26, 2006
When I entered law practice in 1971, it was common in corporate criminal investigations for a single law firm to represent the target corporation and all its relevant employees. They hung together lest they hang separately. Over time, practice changed, and such joint-representation arrangements mostly disappeared. The old paradigm was succeeded by a new one, which recognized the separate interests of the corporation and each of its relevant employees, but also provided a large measure of mutual support and good will on the defense side. This paradigm, too, has been attacked by prosecutors and now has largely disappeared in major federal and some state investigations. It has been succeeded by a new, far harsher paradigm.
Genetic Testing
January 03, 2006
The rise of genetic testing has touched off a tense legal debate over when and if employers and insurance companies should be allowed access to employees' gen-etic data. At issue is whether current privacy laws related to genetics are strong enough to prevent discrimination, and if there are enough regulations governing what companies can and cannot know.
Labor News: 2005 in Review
January 03, 2006
More than 500 leaders and officials of the seven Change to Win federation unions met Nov. 17-19 in Las Vegas to strategize how to work together in organizing campaigns. Organizers, researchers, and communicators from each of the seven unions met to discuss campaigns and strategy to grow the labor movement. This marked perhaps the first time since the founding of the CIO in the 1930s that so many union officials met to discuss joint targeting and strategy.
Courts Grapple with SOX Whistleblower Protections
November 29, 2005
Courts and administrative law judges have begun grappling with issues concerning the scope of SOX's whistleblower provisions in two types of situations that any U.S.-based multinational corporation might encounter: 1) where the whistleblower is located and the whistleblowing occurred outside the U.S., and 2) where the whistleblower's employer is a nonpublic subsidiary of a publicly traded company.
FLSA: New Supreme Court Ruling
November 29, 2005
In its first employment-related decision of this term, the U.S. Supreme Court held in <i>IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez</i> that the time food-processing workers spend walking between changing and production areas is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act. <i>IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez</i>, 2005 WL 2978311 (U.S., Nov. 8). The Court's ruling disposed of appeals from both the Ninth and First Circuits, and resolves a split among the circuit courts.
