Ordinary-Course Preference Defense
Congress' one-word change to the ordinary course of business preference defense will make this already common preference defense even more prevalent. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act's ('BAPCPA') substitution of an 'and' for an 'or' to the defense's elements should significantly assist the typical unsecured creditor in defending a preference claim, and, in most cases, enable the creditor to defend the claim without an expert witness.
An Appealing Proposition
Let's face it, bankruptcy can be frustrating, not to mention costly and lengthy. First is the sober reality that in almost all cases, creditors ' and unsecured creditors especially ' will not be paid in full. Second is the fact that making sure your client's rights are protected, and recoveries maximized, takes time, money, and involvement in the bankruptcy process, all of which can be disruptive to its ongoing operations. The frustration factor, however, reaches its zenith with bankruptcy appeals. Unlike 'normal' appeals in state and federal courts, bankruptcy appeals provide for two levels of automatic appeal. Bankruptcy orders are first appealed to the district court or, in certain jurisdictions, to the bankruptcy appellate panel (BAP), and thereafter each party has the automatic right to appeal anew to the circuit court.
Multiple Debtor Representation
The complex structure of modern corporate entities presents unique challenges when it comes time for a Chapter 11 filing. In addition to facing the fundamental questions of whether Chapter 11 is the right course, when it should be filed, and what the ultimate reorganization strategy should be, management and its counsel must grapple with how to manage a multiple debtor filing. For example, which entities should file? How should the filings be timed? How can the separate interests and obligations of each entity be respected and yet be coordinated in such a way as to make reorganization of the overall enterprise manageable from a practical standpoint? The widely accepted approach is to implement an essentially simultaneous filing on behalf of most or all of the entities in the corporate family. In the interest of efficiency and cost control, a single set of debtors' counsel most often represents all the filing entities, with each of the individual cases jointly administered under a common umbrella.
What Does the Business Appraiser Do?
In many divorces, the 'asset value' of business equity is the largest money piece of the divisible marital pie. Hiring a business valuation expert to appraise the equity, or rights, owned by the parties as of a date in time is normal practice. Yet sometimes there are issues underneath the valuation opinion that 'just do not seem right.'
Converting a Chapter 7 to a Chapter 13
It has been a prevailing view in practice under the Bankruptcy Code that a Debtor has an absolute one-time right under Section 706(a) to convert a case from Chapter 7 to another Chapter, the most common scenario involving conversion from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13. However, two recent circuit level cases, reflecting the case law trend, have found that a motion to convert a Chapter 7 to a Chapter 13 may be denied if not made in good faith.
Pitfalls of Critical Vendor Litigation
The latest development in 'critical vendor' litigation occurred in the case where much of it began ' the Kmart Corporation bankruptcy case. On April 12, 2006, United State Bankruptcy Judge Susan Pierson Sonderby denied motions to dismiss lawsuits seeking the return of critical vendor payments, paving the way for the cases to proceed to trial. Although Judge Sonderby's decision was not published, this latest chapter of the Kmart story is worth noting.
Enron Court Says Transferred Claims Remain Tainted
two recent decisions by the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York serve to reemphasize a maxim well known to those regularly involved in the distressed debt industry. Participants in the market for distressed claims must be aware of the inherent risks and uncertainties in dealing with post-petition debtors, and they must protect themselves accordingly.
The Tarnished Parachute
As American companies struggle to compete in a global market, they are increasingly considering the merits of eliminating or reducing costly retiree benefits. For many companies, the costs of these benefits have become staggering. For example, before recently announcing plans to freeze health benefits for tens of thousands of its white-collar retirees, Ford Motor Co. was facing health-care expenses of more than $3.5 billion. Its rival, General Motors, which according to recent reports owes a projected $89 billion in welfare and pension benefits to its current and future retirees, just announced that it will offer workers with 10 years' experience a payment of $140,000 and a pension, if in return these workers will leave their employment and forgo health care benefits.
