Much Ado About Very Little: Revised Overtime Pay Regulations
The publicity and Congressional reaction surrounding the United States Department of Labor (DOL)'s proposed changes to the overtime pay regulations suggests that those modifications would result in a radical departure from the existing state of the law. An objective review of the changes, however, as initially proposed and as finally implemented reveals that the DOL actually did little to alter the legal landscape.
The ICEman Cometh: How to Avoid Being Put On the 'Spot'
Concerns about domestic security post-9/11, fear that immigrants are moving here to take jobs away from "real" Americans, worries that foreign workers trained here will then "offshore" their positions ... all of these factors have nudged the federal government to more strictly scrutinize U.S. corporations' use of foreign-born talent. <br>The cornerstone of this scrutiny is the Worksite Enforcement Program, administered by the Department of Homeland Security's Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This program is often referred to as the "spot visit program."
An Alternative Fee <i>Meal</i>odrama
A witty, punny tale with a moral ' partners and general counsel are after the same thing: Quality legal work at lower cost, with profitability (and a good meal).
The Powerful Impact of the Non-Foreclosure Notice of Pendency
RPAPL ' 1331 and RPAPL ' 1403 Notices of Pendency are requisite elements for foreclosing a mortgage. <i>See, Chiarelli v. Kotsifos</i>, 5 A.D.3d 345 (a notice of pendency is a prerequisite to obtaining a judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action); <i>Campbell v. Smith</i>, 309 A.D.2d 581, 582 (a notice of pendency is required in a foreclosure action under RPAPL Article 13). In contrast, an <i>ex parte</i> CPLR Article 65 Notice of Pendency (the "Notice") is not required but it is a significant tool in an action claiming title to, or an interest in or the use or enjoyment of, another's land. The filer does not have to make a meritorious showing or post a bond. Article 65 provides mechanisms for the defendant-owner to vacate the Notice that caused an unilaterally imposed restraint on its realty. But, recent case law establishes the near futility of such efforts if the plaintiff has satisfied the minimal statutory requisites for filing the Notice.
Best of the Best Practices in Corporate Governance
This article summarizes certain best of the "best practices" in corporate governance, including those standards that have been implemented by many of the corporations at the forefront of governance reform.
Derivative Or Direct?
A sometimes confusing area of corporate litigation concerns whether a claim asserted by a stockholder in a lawsuit against a corporation's officers and directors is a "derivative" claim brought on behalf of the corporation, or a "direct" claim brought by the stockholder on his or her own behalf rather than the corporation's. The distinction is important, as the proper characterization of a stockholder claim can have a significant impact on the parties and how the lawsuit proceeds, in some instances determining whether it proceeds at all. In a new opinion, <i>Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.</i>, the Delaware Supreme Court has cleared up some of the confusion, holding that a claim is derivative whenever the corporation has suffered the alleged harm and will be the beneficiary of the relief granted by the court.
Cutting the Cost Of e-Discovery
Save everything!" That's the new corporate mantra in response to tougher regulatory requirements and the growing importance of electronic data discovery in litigation. But is "Save Everything!" the right response? CEOs and CFOs may think they'll sleep better knowing that every bit and byte is being saved ' but wait until the bills come in! That'll be an eye-opener!
What Your Company Needs To Know About Records Retention
A recent industry survey reported that nearly half of large companies currently don't have policies about when to keep and when to destroy their electronic records and those that do usually don't enforce them. If your company is one of these businesses, it is risking huge legal problems if someone in your company destroys an e-mail or information on backup tapes that relates to any existing or future litigation ' because your company may wind up being hit with sanctions for spoliation.
Anti-Spam Law Impacts Legitimate e-Mail
Despite its clever name, the recently enacted CAN-SPAM Act does not in fact prohibit "spam." What the law does do is regulate "commercial e-mail," which is defined broadly. Accordingly, the legal department of every business that uses e-mail should be advising its employees to take immediate steps to comply with the Act, as violations carry stiff penalties.
