Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
President Trump and members of Congress have delivered on their promise to give all Americans (or at least most of us) a tax cut this year. On Nov. 16, 2017, the United States House of Representatives did its part. By a vote of 227 to 205, the lower chamber passed the most sweeping tax legislation we've seen in the past 30 years, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
After a frenzied round of deal making, the Senate passed a tax reform bill on December 2. Majorities in both the House and the Senate voted in favor of a conference bill on December 19th. The President signed the bill into law on December 22. They said they desire to lower business and individual tax rates, modernize U.S. international tax rules and simplify the tax code. The Act does not treat taxpayers in all industries identically, however.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.