Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For the fourth time, Exterro has conducted an in-depth survey of federal judges in order to understand better how they see e-discovery law and practice changing. In 2018, partnering with EDRM at Duke Law and BDO, this survey reached farther and deeper than ever before, with 30 federal judges responding to questions covering e-discovery competency, improvements to e-discovery practice, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence that govern e-discovery.
Past surveys of the federal judiciary have compared the judges' responses to those of attorneys or invited e-discovery experts to offer their thoughts on what the results meant. This year, in addition to gathering and analyzing the opinions of 30 federal judges, the survey contains expert analysis of the results from eight sitting and recently retired federal judges.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.