Law Firms: You Can't Buy Yourself Out of Risk

The sample included more than 160 law firm executives (from medium to large firms), and we found that law firms were among some of the highest spenders on security yet were susceptible to some of the most common risks. And the issue will grow over the coming years as the demands of the business drive the adoption of emerging technologies, such as cloud and Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Law Firm Overall Spend on Security Is Among the Highest

Law firms rival their much larger counterparts, telecoms companies, when it comes to security spend as a percentage of IT spend. Lowest of any industry, non-firms reported spending less than 5% on security. Only 21% of firms spent between 5-10%; whereas 40% spent 11-30%, and 29% spent up to half of their IT budget on security. It's a good news, bad news scenario. The good news is law firms have awoken to the threat of cyber-attacks and the potential consequences and are responding with a commitment to security efforts.

Law Firms Are Most Susceptible to Common Security Risks

And now the bad news. Most law firms report that they are susceptible to common security risks and demonstrating table stakes security efforts. Approximately 60% of law firms struggle to manage both malware and non-malware born attacks, leading to significant IT or business impacts. What's worse, the same percentage of firms struggle to bear the growing cost of security efforts, manage and report the status of security risks and patching, and fail to demonstrate the value of IT spend to senior management. A further 58% report difficulties complying with clients or regulators or aligning to risk management requirements.

The Cycle of Despair

The research identified a cycle of despair across all industry segments tied to the gravitational struggle between the demands of the business and the desire to manage risks to the firm. The IT department is caught between the demands of the firm to remain competitive through the adoption of emerging technology, yet held accountable when that technology leads to a security event that causes a material change to the business. As in, the attorneys want new technology, and the partners don't want the associated risk.