Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Jan. 10, 2019, a Fifth Circuit panel held that Gary Magness, a former Stanford International Bank investor, cannot keep the approximately $79 million he received from the bank following the revelation that the bank had conducted a Ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors.
In July 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission opened an investigation of Stanford's operations, eventually charging founder Allen Stanford and other executives with fraud related to a certificate of deposit investment plan that offered “improbable and high interest rates.” Ultimately, the Ponzi scheme left over 18,000 investors with approximately $7 billion in losses. A U.S. District Court appointed Ralph Janvey as the receiver for the bank.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.