Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sridhar Thiruvengadam, the former chief operating officer for Cognizant Technology Solutions (Cognizant), has reached a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with a bribe paid to expedite a large construction project in India and his role in the related cover-up. Cognizant, a NJ-based global technology and consulting services company, has more than half of its staff located in India. The project related to the planned construction of a vast office campus in Chennai that was to cover 2.7 million square feet and cater to approximately 17,500 employees.
According to the SEC's Administrative Order released on Sept. 13 2019, Mr Thiruvengadam, an Indian national and resident who had been with the company for over two decades, caused the company to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act's (FCPA) internal accounting controls and recordkeeping provisions. Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, Mr Thiruvengadam agreed to pay a $50,000 civil penalty and to cooperate fully with the Commission in any related proceedings. In parallel, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to pursue criminal charges against Cognizant's former President and General Counsel. This follows the company's February 2019 settlement with the SEC, in which it agreed to pay $25 million to settle related charges.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.