Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A bankruptcy court's preliminary injunction was "not a final and immediately appealable order," held the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on Dec. 10, 2019. In re Alcor Energy, LLC, 2019 WL 6716420, 4 (D. Del. Dec. 10, 2019). The court declined to "exercise [its] discretion" under 28 U.S.C. §158(a)(3) to hear the interlocutory appeal. Id., citing 16 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, §3926.1 (3d ed. 2017) ("There is no provision for appeal as of right from an injunction order of a bankruptcy judge to the district court.").
A bankruptcy court's injunction is appealable, however, according to the decisions that the Alcor court never mentioned. See, e.g., In re GI Holdings, Inc., 122 Fed. Appx. 554-55 n.2 (3d Cir. 2004) ("Jurisdiction lies for this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1292(a)(1) because the [district court] refused … to modify or dissolve a [bankruptcy court] preliminary injunction."); Reliance Acceptance Corp. v. Levin (In re Reliance Acceptance Group), 235 B.R. 548, 553 (D. Del. 1999) ("the court looks to sections 158(c)(2) and 1292(a) to find the defendants have a right to appeal to this court [from] the Bankruptcy Court's preliminary injunction order."). The Alcor court also missed the latest update to the Wright & Miller treatise that cites In re World Imports Ltd., 820 F.3d 576, 582 n.5 (3d Cir. 2016) with the following: "Injunctions as final. An injunction from the district court can be treated as final from the district court as well as on appeal to the district court." In the recent Third Circuit case, reported Wright & Miller, "the bankruptcy court issued an injunction …. The district court affirmed. The [Third Circuit] noted that the district court had jurisdiction of the appeal from the bankruptcy court both under [28 U.S.C. §]158(a) and under §1292(a) …" 16 Wright & Miller, supra, §3926.1, n.28 (2018 Supp.). Unfortunately, the appellants in Alcor "provided no argument in support of" the district court's appellate jurisdiction and thus "waived any argument that the appeal" was appropriate. Alcor, 2019 WL 6716420 at 4.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.