Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Newsletters
Stay updated with the latest insights and viewpoints from distinguished attorneys and experts through Law Journal Newsletters specialized publications. Each publication offers concise news stories, case briefs, and insider strategies crafted to enhance your career growth.
Each newsletter is expertly curated by an Editorial Board comprising industry experts who understand the nuances and provide actionable solutions.
Digital subscribers gain access to the current issue and extensive digital archives, where you can dive into past publications to enhance your knowledge and strategies.
For introductory rates for new subscribers and Enterprise Access information, contact 800-756-8993 for more details.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
Do divorce lawyers have an obligation to disclose client confidences when it is in the best interests of the client's child to do so? The short answer of the rules of professional responsibility is 'no' because a 'yes' answer is deemed to be fundamentally inconsistent with the premises of the adversary system in which the divorce lawyer functions. The longer answer is that the rules encourage ' but do not require ' a divorce lawyer to counsel the client to authorize the disclosure because it is in the best interests of both parent and child.
Womble Carlyle's technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. Unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift.
Online ticket reseller StubHub faces lawsuits over allegedly unrefunded event tickets in California, after a federal judicial panel ordered that similar cases from jurisdictions in multiple states be coordinated.
