Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Q: We occasionally receive RFPs for work that we really don't want. How can we gracefully phrase the “thanks but no thanks” letter?
A: I wouldn't send a letter. Instead, I encourage you to use this as an opportunity to see how you're positioned with this prospect. First, be very clear and specific internally about why you're not interested. Reasons might include:
Recognize that, on some level, the sender believed that your firm would welcome the RFP, so there is a gap between your respective perceptions. Call and acknowledge receipt of the RFP and, after thanking the originator for thinking of your firm, ask, “What made you decide to include us in this RFP?” Most responses will suggest that the sender perceives that you have the necessary skills. (“If they can do this work, they will want to.”)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.