Supreme Court holds that 'actual dilution' to mark needed to sustain claim
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that in order to sustain an action under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995, a plaintiff must show 'actual dilution' to its trademark, not the mere likelihood of harm.
This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.