Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Producers are rushing to meet the public's demand for reality content. This content includes film and TV productions based on the lives of real people. But there are pitfalls in producing 'biopics' or 'docudramas.' By their very nature, concocted scenes and contrived dialogue inherent in these types of productions may give rise to liability. In fact, there have been a growing number of civil actions or claims made concerning the manner in which certain parties have been portrayed.
Various claims have been made by a wide array of parties, including the individuals who actually were or claim to have been the subject portrayed in the film, the heirs of those depicted in the film and, in one case, a town where a depicted deceased individual once resided. Given the range of potential claimants, there is a growing need for actors, writers, producers and studios to consider whether their work is defamatory in nature or otherwise infringes on the rights of any individuals.
The three basic categories of claims that are made in the context of the circumstances surrounding the production of a film or TV program involving real events or individuals are for defamation, invasion of rights of privacy and violation of right of publicity. Defamation consists of a claim involving a false and unprivileged publication that exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or causes him or her to be shunned or avoided, or which has the tendency to injure him or her professionally. Invasion of the right of privacy comprises rights an individual has to generally be left alone and out of the public eye. A violation of the right of publicity seeks to protect an individual's right to exploit his or her own name or likeness for commercial purposes.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?