Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Marketing the Law FirmLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Research Notes

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 26, 2003

The BTI Consulting Group, Boston, MA just released the results of a new survey of law firm Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs). The results are based on telephone interviews conducted during the first quarter of 2003 with the CMOs of 62 AmLaw 200 firms. Among the findings:

  • The Pareto Principle is alive and well. A typical law firm derives 80% of its revenue from 25% of its clients.
  • There are 13 people on the marketing staff of a typical law firm. That translates to one person for every 41 attorneys.
  • The range in gross billings per marketing staffer runs from $8 million to $20 million.
  • One hundred percent of the CMOs surveyed have undertaken technology changes to improve marketing efforts and results. One in four CMOs have implemented or improved their CRM systems in the past year.
  • 42% of law firms have conducted formal client satisfaction surveys in the last two years. This is up 20% from 2001. While most use a mix of channels for conducting surveys, only 11% rely on Web-based or e-mail instruments.
  • Over the past twelve months, 62% of CMOs have implemented changes designed at improving client retention.

The full analysis of the survey is available in BTI's 'CMO Strategies for Success' at http://www.bticonsulting.com/

www.ftc.gov eMarketer.com www.metagroup.com www.forrester.com

Building a Customer Experience Metrics Portfolio.

How should firms measure customer experience? Customers naturally rate their interactions based on factors such as previous experience and current perception. If your firm wants to change customer perceptions, or influence future 'buying' behavior, you must build a metric portfolio that includes data on customers': past actions and experiences; demographics and psychographics; and direct observation of customer behavior. Short of becoming a crystal ball gazer, you can talk with firms such as ForeSee Results and Usability Sciences (for online behavior) and InContext Enterprises (for offline behavior) to evaluate future activity based on past behavior.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Second Circuit Reinforces Bankruptcy Code Settlement Payment Safe Harbor Image

The Second Circuit affirmed the lower courts' judgment that a "transfer made … in connection with a securities contract … by a qualifying financial institution" was entitled "to the protection of ... §546 (e)'s safe harbor ...."