Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On July 18, 2019, a federal grand jury in Cincinnati indicted the former compliance officer of a pharmaceutical distributor, James Barclay, the pharmaceutical distributor, and others with conspiring to illegally distribute controlled substances. Among other things, the indictment alleged that Barclay, who was responsible for supervising the distributor’s compliance with drug laws, and others sold millions of painkiller pills to pharmacies, while regularly exceeding the company’s internal threshold limits and ignoring obvious signs of diversion and abuse. When the company’s internal suspicious order monitoring system flagged many of these orders, Barclay and other defendants allegedly failed to conduct any due diligence or report the suspicious orders to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), as required by law. The Barclay indictment was issued around three months after federal prosecutors in Manhattan brought felony criminal charges against a different drug distributor, its former Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), William Pietruszewski, and others on allegations that they opened new customer accounts without conducting due diligence and sold customers controlled substances despite knowing they were being distributed for illegitimate purposes. On April 19, 2019, Pietruszewski pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, conspiracy to defraud the U.S., and willful failure to file suspicious order reports with the DEA.
*May exclude premium content
By Jacqueline C. Wolff, Scott T. Lashway, and Matthew M.K. Stein
In times of crisis, criminal activity — particularly crimes involving theft and fraud — tend to spike. There is no reason to believe that the Covid-19 pandemic and the unrest in the financial markets will be any different. An important difference for company counsel, however, will be in how the malfeasance, negligence or wrongdoing can be investigated.
By John Kelly
The COVID-19 pandemic is resulting in landlords and tenants closely reviewing a clause in their lease that was long considered unimportant boilerplate. Yes, we are referring to the “force majeure” provision.
By C. Ryan Barber
In a practice that prizes in-person meetings, virtual communication has become commonplace.
By Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan Sack
This article discusses the standard for ordering a bill of particulars in the Second Circuit, drawing a comparison with the standard for civil fraud claims, and then describes a recent decision ordering a bill of particulars in the high-profile prosecution growing out of the Theranos blood-testing scandal. The decision in that case highlights the importance of seeking bills of particulars in fraud cases.