Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
State News
New Jersey Bar Protests Tort-Reform Fee on Attorney Licenses
Adding its voice to the rising debate on medical malpractice reform, the New Jersey State Bar Association May 13 adopted a resolution calling for the state legislature to rethink its proposed $50-per-year assessment on attorneys' licenses to help fund a state kitty that would pay up to $700,000 in non-economic damages to victims of medical malpractice. The resolution, drawn up by a group formed in January ' the New Jersey State Bar Association Task Force on Medical Malpractice ' was formulated in response to the New Jersey State Senate's 35-to-2 approval March 20 of a bill that would, among other things, place a $300,000 limit on physician liability for non-economic medical malpractice damages. As part of that legislation, the state would set up a fund ' called the Medical Malpractice Insurance Liability Excess Fund ' to pay up to an additional $700,000 in non-economic damages, should a jury award more than the $300,000 limit. The money to fund this program would come from a $50 assessment on each New Jersey attorney's license to practice, as well as from a $3 fee per employee, collected from the state's employers.
The Bar's resolution was formulated following input from its members who represent doctors, hospitals, the insurance industry and patients. In addition, representatives of the Bar Association met with members of the state legislature, New Jersey's governor Jim McGreevey and members of the U.S. Congress.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.