Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Judge Sends Lawyer Back to School
Stephen Orlofsky, a U.S. District Court judge, gave Marlton, NJ, attorney Frank Branella an unusual penalty for concluding a time-barred medical malpractice case as one of federal RICO and civil rights. (Balthazar v. Atlantic City Medical Center, 02-1136) Instead of depriving the attorney of payments, Judge Orlofsky decreed that Branella needs to attend courses in order to acquaint himself with ethics and professionalism. The judge said he imposed the sanction after giving Branella a written warning of his possible violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (b)(2), which requires an assertion regarding the factual and legal circumstances of their claims. Branella had a state court medical malpractice case was dismissed by Atlantic Superior Court Judge Carol Higbee in 2001. The Balthazar federal suit was opened by Branella in 2000, and it charged a hospital and three doctors with falsification, concealment of negligence and federal and state RICO law violations. Although the federal suit was dismissed, Branella was granted leave to amend his complaint. However, the judge was not happy with the revision, claming that, along other things, it was often beyond comprehension. The attorney must take the courses within the next 12 months, and then he needs to file a court affidavit to affirm his successful completion. No comment was made by Branella except that he plans to appeal both the case's dismissal and the sanctions' imposition.
ALM Exec Joins Marketing Group
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.