Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Trademark Infringement Claim Not Covered Under 'Advertising Injury' Provision
In Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 335 F.3d 453 (5th Cir. Tex. July 7, 2003), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (applying Texas law) affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer holding that allegations of trademark infringement were not covered under the provisions of the insurance policy relating to “advertising injury.” The court held that the claim of trademark infringement was excluded by the policy's exclusion for “advertising injury arising out of … breach of contract, other than misappropriation of advertising ideas under an implied contract.”
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.