Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It has been often said that Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code can be summarized as the “Three Rs,” precisely “reorganize, restructure, and rehabilitate.” In practicality, this includes steps such as “reducing headcount,” (firing people, without the euphemism), streamlining operations, reordering debt, and so on. One of the most critical components of such lifesaving steps is the divestiture of assets, in plain English, selling off assets that are either unprofitable and unwanted burdens or those items that can fetch high prices that can add quickly to the cash reserves of a troubled company.
Thus, asset sales are part and parcel of the typical Chapter 11 and include not only the sale of real estate, but also the sale of other “hard” assets, such as leased or financed equipment and personal property. Sometimes these sales are done as part of the ongoing process of rehabilitating the beleaguered entity, and other times they are accomplished pursuant to a court-approved Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. And therein lies the issue.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.