Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Dealing With the Implications of Pay-or-Play Agreements for Talent

By Sunny Brenner
September 13, 2003

Disputes arising out of 'pay-or-play' deals between film producers and talent are among the most fertile and reliable breeding grounds for litigation in the entertainment industry. In the last year alone:

  • Sharon Stone filed a lawsuit against two producers based on an alleged pay-or-play agreement to pay her $14 million to star in a sequel to the movie 'Basic Instinct';
  • Sean Connery sued Mandalay Pictures and its chairman for allegedly breaching an oral agreement ' which presumably entailed a pay-or-play or 'pay-and-play' commitment ' to pay the actor more than $17 million to star in and produce a thriller called 'End Game';
  • Sean Penn and producer Steve Bing exchanged lawsuits in connection with an as-yet-unproduced motion picture, with Penn accusing Bing's company of breaching a pay-or-play commitment of $10 million; and
  • Kathy Bates reportedly settled a lawsuit that accused a producer and his production company of breaching a pay-or-play guarantee to pay the actress $1.25 million whether or not her services were utilized in the film 'Carolina Torn Asunder.'

And for every dispute that results in the filing of a lawsuit, one can safely assume that there are several more being fought out behind the scenes, and either arbitrated or settled. 

From a practitioner's standpoint, it might be asked why the same basic deal point gives rise with such frequency to high stakes lawsuits, particularly given the widespread agreement in the industry on its meaning. Simply put, and as various courts that have been called upon to construe pay-or-play language have found, a pay-or-play commitment generally entails a promise to compensate a person whether the person's services are used or not.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.