Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lease provisions that provide for the tenant to make periodic payments to the landlord for parking privileges are often unclear as to whether the tenant is required to pay for the availability of such spaces, whether or not the tenant utilizes them. Because parking is typically dealt with either as an attachment to the lease or in a provision of the lease that is distinct from the rent provision, parking charges are typically not included within the definition of 'rent.' Because of this, a tenant may have a technical argument that it does not owe the landlord parking charges unless it actually uses the available parking. If a landlord (and/or its mortgage lender) are relying on the income stream from the parking area, this ambiguity is troublesome. From the tenant's perspective, if the tenant seeks the flexibility of utilizing the parking on a pay-as-it-goes basis, it should not settle for ambiguity, but should negotiate a provision that specifically allows the tenant to utilize parking privileges at its election and only pay for such privileges for the duration of time that it actually uses them.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT
Lease provisions that provide for the tenant to make periodic payments to the landlord for parking privileges are often unclear as to whether the tenant is required to pay for the availability of such spaces, whether or not the tenant utilizes them. Because parking is typically dealt with either as an attachment to the lease or in a provision of the lease that is distinct from the rent provision, parking charges are typically not included within the definition of 'rent.' Because of this, a tenant may have a technical argument that it does not owe the landlord parking charges unless it actually uses the available parking. If a landlord (and/or its mortgage lender) are relying on the income stream from the parking area, this ambiguity is troublesome. From the tenant's perspective, if the tenant seeks the flexibility of utilizing the parking on a pay-as-it-goes basis, it should not settle for ambiguity, but should negotiate a provision that specifically allows the tenant to utilize parking privileges at its election and only pay for such privileges for the duration of time that it actually uses them.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.