Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Usually, when a family-law attorney takes on a divorce case, it's with the expectation that at some time before or after the work on the case is completed, he or she will be paid for services rendered. Sure, attorneys often have trouble getting paid by their clients, who may not have the necessary funds at their disposal, but when a client cannot pay, the attorney has other means, including turning to the court for assistance in getting payment from the opposing spouse. But suppose the client discharges the attorney from the case before the divorce is finalized? The option of seeking redress by asking the court to compel the client's spouse to pay is foreclosed, according to a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in the case of Frankel v. Frankel, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9279 (App. Div., 2d Dept. 9/8/03).
In the underlying matrimonial action, attorneys from the firm of Schlissel, Ostrow, Karabatos, Poepplein & Taub, PLLC, Mineola, represented the wife during more than 30 days of the child-custody phase of the couple's trial. During that phase of the trial, the husband was ordered to pay his wife's attorneys $25,000 in pendente lite fees. However, less than a month later, the wife had discharged her attorneys, as reflected on the record on March 30, 2001. Also on that date (after the attorneys had been discharged), an attorney for the firm indicated on the record that the firm was asserting a lien on the wife's file and intended to apply for its accrued legal fees.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.