Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 01, 2003

Connecticut Lawmakers Hold Hearings on Malpractice Reform

In testimony before Connecticut's Legislative Program Review Committee on September 18, the state's insurance commissioner, Susan Cogswell, urged lawmakers to set a $250,000 cap on pain and suffering awards as a remedy for the state's medical malpractice insurance crisis. Also taking part in the 5-hour hearing were advocates for the medical profession, insurance industry, victims of medical malpractice and attorneys. The state's largest medical malpractice insurer, Connecticut Medical Insurance Co., was represented by its CEO, Denise Funk, who testified that a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages would allow the company to immediately lower premiums by 10%.

Victims' advocate George Meder, whose child died during outpatient surgery for an ear condition 3 years ago, pointed out to the legislators, however, that Connecticut ranks 40th among states in disciplining its doctors for substandard performance. He maintained that it was more important to the cause of reducing medical malpractice insurance premiums for doctors who are repeat offenders to be prevented from practicing. Defense attorney Roland F. Young III suggested to the legislators that defense counsel should be informed at the outset of a case as to which doctor had certified the matter as worthy of suit, so that legitimacy of grounds for the action could be evaluated earlier.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.