Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

And Then There Were None

By Alfred G. Feliu

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, like the state in which its San Francisco courthouse sits, has a mind of its own. Its contrariness, however, has also made it perennially the circuit court that the United States Supreme Court loves to overturn most. On the highly combustible topic of arbitration of statutory claims, however, the full Ninth Circuit beat the Supreme Court to the punch and overruled itself by holding that employers may require the arbitration of statutory claims. EEOC v. Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripts, 2003 WL 22251382 (9th Cir. 9/30/03) (en banc)

By now, the story is familiar. A three-judge panel in Duffield vs. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998) ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1991 precluded employers from making arbitration a condition of employment. The Ninth Circuit stood alone among the circuits on this point as every other circuit had ruled otherwise. Last year, another Ninth Circuit panel ruled that Duffield had been implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores, Inc., v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 (2001). EEOC v. Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripts, 303 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2002). Now, the full Ninth Circuit rejects that Panel's findings regarding the applicability of Circuit City, but nonetheless overturns Duffield as being “wrongly decided.” In doing so, the full court relied heavily on Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. 500 U.S. 20 (1991), and the fact that the Civil Rights Act of 1991 expressly encourages arbitration where appropriate and to the extent authorized by law. The full Ninth Circuit reasoned, “it would be ironic to interpret statutory language encouraging the use of arbitration and containing no prohibitory language as evincing Congress” intent to preclude arbitration of Title VII claims.” Perhaps most surprising, the full court voted 8 to 3 to overturn Duffield, although there was a strong dissent supporting the continued validity of the original Duffield decision.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.