Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What constitutes an acceptable book manuscript has been at the heart of numerous disputes between authors and publishers. An acceptance clause in a recent dispute stated:
A Work shall be “acceptable” under this Agreement if such Work meets a standard comparable to the literary merit of Author's previous works.
In this case, internationally known author Mark Helprin signed a five-book deal containing a $2 million advance with Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc. (HBJ) in 1989. In 1995, HBJ published “Memoir from Antproof Case,” Helprin's first book under the contract. Helprin submitted the draft for the second book in October 2002. Two months later, HBJ's president wrote Helprin that the manuscript was unacceptable. Helprin filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging in part that HBJ's rejection of the second book amounted to breach of contract.
HBJ moved to dismiss, contending that Helprin was barred from filing suit by Paragraph 8 of the publishing agreement that stated “if a Work is not published within the time provided in Paragraph 6 [ie, within 18 months after delivery and acceptance of the final revised manuscript] … Author may thereafter request Publisher by written notice … to publish such Work within six months after Publisher's receipt of Author's request. If, after receipt of such notice, Publisher fails to publish such Work within such period, this Agreement will terminate with respect to such Work immediately and automatically at the end of such period, all rights to such Work will revert to Author on the effective date of termination without further obligation or liability on the part of Publisher, and Author will have the right to retain any advances previously paid, but will be entitled to no other compensation, remedy, or damages, and Author will retain the right to sell such Work to another publisher and retain the proceeds. Publisher's failure to publish a Work that it has accepted according to the provisions … hereof will not alter the conditions under which Author is deemed to have satisfied his obligation in regard to such Work.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.