Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
California Governor Signs Online Privacy Protection Act
On Oct. 11, then-Gov. Gray Davis signed California A.B. 68, the Online Privacy Protection Act of 2003 (Online Privacy Act). The Online Privacy Act requires that the collection of personally identifiable information from California residents through a Web site or online service for commercial purposes be done pursuant to a conspicuously posted privacy policy. The privacy policy must identify the categories of personally identifiable information collected about individuals, and must identify the types of third parties with whom the data may be shared. Additionally, if the operator of the site or service maintains a process for individuals to view and request changes to such data, then the policy must provide a description of that process. Finally, the policy must describe the process by which the operator will notify consumers of material changes to such privacy policy.
An operator will be in violation of this law if it fails to post its privacy policy in accordance with the law within 30 days after being notified of noncompliance, or if it fails to comply with its privacy policy, either knowingly and willfully, or negligently and materially.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.