Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Should Your Firm Keep Two -- or More -- Sets of Books?

By Sheldon I. Banoff
December 01, 2003

Most law firms operate as general partnerships, limited liability partnerships or limited liability companies (together, “partnerships”, whose members having capital in the firm herein are “partners”).

Does your partnership keep two sets of books ' or more? Al Capone kept two sets of books, and the judge sent him to the Federal Pen for doing so. Yet many law firms (and other professional businesses) legally keep two or more sets of books, arising from different accounting systems prescribed by 1) their partnership Agreements; 2) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) audited statements (which are required by some lenders and landlords), and 3) the tax laws. As a result, the firm's net assets ' and the partners' ownership of the law firm, as reflected in the partners' capital accounts ' may be substantially different under each set of books. Moreover, the amount and timing of the firm's cash distributions to partners, the amount of the partners' annual income taxes, and the availability and amount of bank loans to the firm may all be affected by the firm's applicable accounting methods ' all items that may substantially affect the partners' pocketbooks.

Let's analyze each type of accounting system ' the 'books' ' that the law firm may maintain, and how each may differ.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.