Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

What Not to Do in a Hostile Work Environment Case

By Kenneth J. McCulloch
December 01, 2003

A recent decision, Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, d/b/a Le Bar Bat, 2003 WL 22299315 (S.D.N.Y. 10/07/03) (Sweet, D. J.), offers many lessons for employers about what to do, and not to do, to position themselves for a successful summary judgment motion in a hostile work environment case.

This dispute has an extensive and tortured history. The plaintiffs in Boggs were hostesses at Le Bar Bat, a well-known New York City bar and restaurant. One of the Defendants, Patrick Kelly, the Director of Banquets and Public Relations, had earlier been charged with, and convicted of, federal crimes of obstruction of justice and witness tampering for trying to have witnesses lie about events. Defendant Larry Cerrone, the General Manager, was alleged to have referred to three of the African-American plaintiffs as “dark, light, and semi-sweet chocolate,” and when they worked nights together, he referred to the shift as “chocolate night”. When one of these plaintiffs complained, he apologized, but continued thereafter to refer to that employee as “you people.” Cerrone was also accused of speaking to one of the plaintiffs in Ebonics for 2 weeks. Another employee said Cerrone frequently made comments of a sexual nature to her and engaged in unwanted physical contact, like hugging, kissing, and rubbing her shoulders, leading her to quit her job.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.