Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

John Gaal's Ethics Corner

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

Q: My opponent in some pending litigation is representing multiple defendants. I believe this representation violates the conflict rules under the Code of Professional Responsibility. The conflict, however, does not directly involve my client. Do I have “standing” to seek my opponent's disqualification on this conflict basis?

A: It may depend on the specific court hearing your case. Several New York State courts have seemingly taken the position that some type of “standing” based on direct involvement in the conflict is required, although not always in so many words. For example, in both Singh v. Friedson, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12057 (2d Dept. 2003) and D'Alessandro v. Eastman Kodak Company, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10029 (4th Dept. 2003), counsel for one party moved to disqualify opposing counsel based on alleged conflicts involving relationships between those opposing counsel, and their current or former clients. As in your situation, in neither case was the moving party directly involved in the alleged conflicts. Both the Second and Fourth Departments took a very narrow view in denying the moving party's motion, and in each case concluded that because the parties seeking disqualification were not themselves current or former clients of the lawyers sought to be disqualified, the motions were properly denied. Some federal courts have taken a similar stance, requiring a moving party to have some direct interest in the alleged conflict in order to establish standing to bring a disqualification motion. See O'Connor v. Jones, 946 F. 2d 1395 (8th Cir. 1991); In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation, 530 F. 2d 83 (5th Cir. 1976), but see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Daniel Int'l Corp., 563 F. 2d 671 (5th Cir. 1977).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.