Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
KEY MONEY
Under California law, a landlord has no liability for damages when he merely requests “key money” (an upfront bonus payment made by the tenant in order to secure the tenancy); he may be subject to a penalty where key money is requested and paid by the tenant, and where the landlord subsequently refuses to state the amount of the key money payment in the resulting lease. Edamerica Inc., et al., v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles; Kwan Jin Jung, Real Parties in Interest, B167449, Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, Dec. 23, 2003.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?