Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
First Circuit Creates Circuit Split on Lease Assumption Issue
Becoming the first circuit court to address the issue since the Ninth Circuit's controversial ruling in In re Claremont Acquisition Corp., 113 F.3d 1029, 1034-35 (9th Cir. 1997), the First Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's rationale holding that non-monetary defaults of unexpired leases are not required to be cured before assumption. Eagle Insurance Company and Newark Insurance Company v. BankVest Capital Corp. (In re BankVest Capital Corp.), No. 03-9006 (March 15, 2004).
The First Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) and held that under ' 365(b)(2)(D) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor-in-possession is not required to assume an unexpired lease without first curing non-monetary defaults. The court noted that Ninth Circuit's decision in Claremont has been sharply criticized by “bankruptcy commentators, who nearly unanimously regard that case as an obstacle to the successful reorganization of many debtors in bankruptcy,” and that the uninstructive legislative history of ' 365(b)(2)(D) “at best” indicates an intent “to free debtors from lease provisions requiring the payment of penalty rates.” The court concluded that this “suggests that Congress meant ' 365(b)(2)(D) to excuse debtors from the obligation to cure non-monetary defaults as a condition of assumption.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.