Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Are welfare recipients who participate in mandatory Work Experience Programs (WEP) protected by statutes such as Title VII and the FLSA? In an expansive reading of the definition of employees, two federal courts recently ruled that such “workers” are “employees” within the meaning of the federal statutory scheme and, therefore, may seek relief for discrimination at the workplace or for compensation for excess work.
In the first case, the Second Circuit held that an employer-employee relationship exists when a person is compelled to work in order to receive certain benefits, even if such benefits stem from public assistance. United States v. City of New York, 359 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2004). In the other case, a Northern District judge held that the FLSA may allow WEP participants to seek compensation for work performed in excess of the program's mandated number of hours. Stone v. McGowan, 2004 WL 415227 (N.D.N.Y. 3/2/04) (Mordue, J.)
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.