Expert testimony 'can be both powerful and quite misleading' because of a jury's difficulty in evaluating such evidence. ' Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993).
Effective Use of Experts: The Rules of Engagement
Expert testimony 'can be both powerful and quite misleading' because of a jury's difficulty in evaluating such evidence. — <i>Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc.,</i> 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993). Expert testimony is an integral part of products liability litigation. As the excerpt above articulates, expert testimony is powerful and its importance should not be underestimated or trivialized. Selecting an expert who can simplify the issues for the fact-finder, yet maintain his or her composure under cross-examination, is a difficult and time-consuming process. In short, because your expert's credibility is critical to the success of your case, you need to understand the rules of engagement at the outset.
By
Lori Cohen And Tom MazziottiThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
