Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You've just arrived at your office on Monday morning after an unusually restful weekend. Before you even have a chance to take off your coat, you are advised that Mrs. Jones, a client involved in a contentious divorce and custody battle, is on the telephone, and is pleading to speak to you immediately. You pick up the phone and she tells you that her 4-year-old daughter, who has just returned from a visit with her father, has a red and irritated vaginal area, and says that her that the father touched her genitals during the weekend visitation. Your client further advises you that she took the child to the Emergency Room for an examination, and was advised by the hospital staff that they were required to report these allegations of sexual abuse to Child Protective Services. Your client wants to know what to do next, how these allegations are going to impact the divorce and custody case, and whether she will be accused of making up these allegations.
Sound familiar? In order to attempt to answer your client's questions regarding whether these allegations will be believed, a review of the literature dealing with allegations of sexual abuse within the context of divorce and custody litigation, and the prevalence of false allegations of sexual abuse, is necessary.
A Brief History
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.