Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Developments of Note

By Julian S. Millstein, Edward A. Pisacreta and Jeffrey D. Neuburger
June 01, 2004

CAN-SPAM Update

The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, in cooperation with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), instituted the first criminal action under the federal CAN-SPAM Act. U.S. v. Lin, et al., No. 04-80383 (E.D. Mich. complaint filed April 28, 2004). Four individual defendants were arrested and charged with violations of the act and other federal laws based on the falsification of e-mail header information in an e-mail marketing scheme that involved false representations concerning diet products. The defendants are also named in a civil suit the FTC filed under CAN-SPAM. FTC v. Phoenix Avatar et al., FTC File No. 042-3084, Civil Action No. 04C 2897 (N.D. Ill. complaint filed April 28, 2004). The court in the Phoenix Avatar case issued a preliminary injunction against the spamming and froze the defendants' assets.

In other developments, the FTC announced on April 29 that it filed an action against an Australian company that the commission alleges is responsible for massive amounts of spam in the United States advertising products claimed to contain human growth hormone. FTC v. Global Web Promotions Pty Ltd., FTC File No. 042-3086, Civil Action No.: 04C 3022 (N.D. Ill. complaint filed April 28, 2004).

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?