Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Commercial real estate professionals often draft ground leases for those situations in which a tenant (the “Ground Lessee/Sublessor”) leases land from a fee owner (the “Ground Lessor”) to be developed into a shopping center or some other development with a mix of retail or other commercial tenants. Numerous occasions arise, however, in which a ground lease is needed because the Ground Lessee/Sublessor intends to sublease the parcel to a single-use tenant entity (the “Tenant”). When drafting the sublease for this Tenant, the real estate practitioner must tailor the ground lease to take into account the specific requirements of the Tenant's sublease.
The attorney representing the Ground Lessee/Sublessor should follow certain key principles: compatibility, flexibility, and “financibility.” Specifically, the terms of the ground lease must work in concert with the Tenant's sublease and be compatible so that the Ground Lessee/Sublessor is adequately protected.
The principles of flexibility and compatibility refer simply to the need of the Ground Lessee/Sublessor to ensure maximum freedom to react to decisions made by the Tenant and to give the Tenant the flexibility it expects or demands during the term of the Tenant's sublease. Most importantly, the ground lease must be drafted in such a way that it remains financible. By adhering to these principles, the drafter will be in a better position to ensure that the ground lease meets the needs of both the Ground Lessee/Sublessor and the Tenant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?